Trump lawyers target what Letitia James won’t say about evidence in $450M case
President Donald Trump’s legal representation is demanding an answer to a key question in the civil suit that almost cost him $464 million.In a letter filed with the New York...
By Fox News · Fox News
President Donald Trump’s legal representation is demanding an answer to a key question in the civil suit that almost cost him $464 million. In a letter filed with the New York Supreme Court on Thursday, Trump’s representation is arguing that James failed to comply with a court order that required her to present "the preservation practices" and "its preservation efforts." The demand is the latest objection Trump’s attorneys have used to argue that the case, which is being reconsidered, is full of errors. Trump’s attorneys believe James may have key evidence she hasn’t turned over — communications with Michel Cohen, a former attorney for Trump. DELETED EMAIL DETAILS ALLEGED TRUMP-TARGETING PUSH INSIDE LETITIA JAMES’ OFFICE: ‘FIND AND PURSUE CRIMES’ "In seeking the discovery, defendants rely on a January 16, 2026 article by Cohen, published on the online platform Substack in which he asserted that, in meetings with lawyers from [James’s] office, he had ‘felt pressured and coerced to only provide information and testimony that would satisfy the government’s desire to build the cases against and secure a judgement and convictions against President Trump," a court filing reads. Cohen was a star witness in the civil suit. During trial, he helped build the case that Trump had routinely misrepresented the value of his properties and testified that Trump had given him target net-worth numbers to meet. Although the judge denied the request for additional discovery, the process where parties disclose relevant information about the case, he did require James to detail the process it has used to maintain and preserve information. Trump’s attorneys maintain James failed to do so. "[New York Attorney General’s Office] also carefully avoids representing one way or the other whether any requested materials in fact exist, and, if they do, whether NYAG has confirmed that they are being preserved," they wrote. "Instead of actually complying with the Order, NYAG has simply recited in ge…