Deaf people excluded from gene-editing debate | Letter
There is no majority support for use of gene editing on non-life-threatening conditions, writes Tom Lichy of the British Deaf AssociationYour editorial (The Guardian view on gene-edited humans: darker uses...
By Guardian Staff · The Guardian Opinion
There is no majority support for use of gene editing on non-life-threatening conditions, writes Tom Lichy of the British Deaf Association Your editorial ( The Guardian view on gene-edited humans: darker uses must be acknowledged alongside medical ones, 5 July ) offers welcome support to those expressing concern about the lack of public dialogue on gene-edited humans. These concerns are exacerbated when some scientists view the use of germline editing to eradicate hereditary conditions as inevitable. The new polling for the Progress Educational Trust reported in your editorial indicates that the UK public agrees with the use of gene editing to correct life‑threatening genetic conditions. No such majority supports use for conditions such as deafness which are not remotely life-threatening. Continue reading...